🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I usually shied away from significant use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. My preference was for narrative flow and session development to be guided by character actions instead of pure luck. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

An influential actual-play show utilizes a DM who regularly requests "fate rolls" from the participants. He does this by selecting a type of die and defining consequences contingent on the roll. This is essentially no different from consulting a random table, these are devised spontaneously when a character's decision doesn't have a predetermined conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own session, mainly because it seemed interesting and presented a break from my usual habits. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the ongoing balance between planning and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

An Emotional In-Game Example

At a session, my party had concluded a city-wide conflict. Afterwards, a cleric character inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. Instead of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply emotional sequence where the characters came upon the remains of their companions, still holding hands in their final moments. The cleric performed a ceremony, which was uniquely powerful due to previous roleplaying. As a parting gesture, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, revealing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the item's contained spell was precisely what the group lacked to solve another pressing story problem. One just script such serendipitous moments.

Honing Your Improvisation

This incident caused me to question if improvisation and thinking on your feet are actually the core of D&D. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Groups reliably excel at ignoring the most detailed plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate scenarios on the fly.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to train these abilities without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to use them for small-scale circumstances that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. For instance, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I could use it to determine if the PCs enter a room right after a key action unfolds.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps maintain tension and foster the sensation that the story is alive, evolving according to their choices immediately. It prevents the feeling that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned script, thereby strengthening the shared aspect of storytelling.

Randomization has historically been part of the original design. Early editions were reliant on encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, it's not necessarily the only path.

Achieving the Right Balance

It is perfectly no problem with thorough preparation. But, it's also fine no problem with relinquishing control and permitting the dice to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Control is a significant aspect of a DM's job. We use it to run the game, yet we often struggle to cede it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Experiment with a little chance for minor details. The result could discover that the surprising result is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have pre-written by yourself.