🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. While he is called Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a selection process with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list included various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to question.